Consultation on the Carbon Trust Product-related

Emissions Reduction Framework (PERF)

 
 
 
 
 

Thank you for providing your comments on the second draft of the PERF.

We received very helpful feedback from the first consultation. As there were divergent views on key aspects of the approach proposed in the first draft of the PERF, this draft outlines two alternatives. We would appreciate direct feedback on whether you prefer the proposed approach or the alternative option and how comfortable you feel with each. There is also a box at the end which allows for additional comments on any aspect of the PERF.

We will review all the comments that we receive and take them into account as we develop the final version of the PERF.

All comments on this second draft need to be submitted by Friday June 20th 2008.

Please check this box of you do not want your comments to be attributable:

If you have difficulties submitting comments online, please contact Colin Gray (Arup, colin.gray@arup.com)

To discuss the PERF or your comments with one of the project team please contact:

Sarah Roberts (Arup, sarah.roberts@arup.com T: + 44 (0) 114 283 3711)

Jim Peacock (Carbon Trust, jim.peacock@carbontrust.co.uk)

In the US, Jason Morrison (Pacific Institute, jmorrison@pacinst.org T: + 1 (0) 510 251 1600)

Stakeholder information


Please enter the following details:

Name:

Email adddress:

Organisation:

Organisation Type:

Geographical Location:


Comments

  
01.Overall, do you prefer the proposed approach or the alternative option?
Comments (max 2000 characters):
 Proposed approach
Alternative option
02a.How comfortable do you feel with the proposed approach?
(1=Very uncomfortable, 5=Very comfortable)
1 2 3 4 5
02b.Are there any particular aspects that you would change?
Comments (max 2000 characters):
 Y N
03a.How comfortable do you feel with the alternative option?
(1=Very uncomfortable, 5=Very comfortable)
1 2 3 4 5
03b.Are there any particular aspects that you would change?
Comments (max 2000 characters):
 Y N
04.Do you agree that with the proposed approach to verification?
Comments (max 2000 characters):
 Y N


Please use this box to add your comments (max 10000 characters):